Philip Morris
Report Attacked
By NAOMI KOPPEL, Associated Press Writer, JULY 17, 2001
GENEVA (AP) - Anti-smoking groups reacted
angrily Tuesday to a report by cigarette giant Philip Morris that said
tobacco could save a government millions of dollars in health care and
pensions because many smokers die earlier.
The report, commissioned by Philip Morris
from research company Arthur D. Little International, looked at the
cost of smoking in the Czech Republic in 1999, and concluded
that the government had benefited from the "indirect positive effects''
of early deaths. Savings on health care, pensions and housing for the
elderly totaled $30 million, the report said.
The British-based group Action on Smoking
and Health described the study as "a sort of extermination program
for the newly retired.''
"The whole exercise is repellent
and should be dismissed. Philip Morris is whispering in the ear of the
Czech Government, saying: 'Look, we can help you
deal with those expensive old people, so why don't you go easy on controlling
smoking?''' said John Connolly, the group's public affairs manager.
Matthew Myers, president of the U.S. group
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said the analysis represented "not
only bad economics, but also a callous disregard for life.''
Remi Calvet, director of communications
for Philip Morris at its European headquarters in Lausanne, Switzerland,
said the report had been commissioned to obtain economic data for the
company, which makes 80 percent of the cigarettes sold in the Czech
Republic. "We deeply regret any impression that premature death
of smokers could represent a benefit for society,'' he told The Associated
Press. "Tobacco is a controversial industry, but we are still an
industry and sometimes we need some economic data on our industry.''
The report concluded that "the effect
of smoking on the public finance balance in the Czech Republic in 1999
was positive,'' estimated at $146 million. The study - completed in
November 2000 but only recently handed to the Czech government - said
it had worked on the assumption that "smoking can lead to a reduced
life span of smokers'' and also accepted that nonsmokers can be harmed
by secondhand smoke.
It said the cost of smoking to the Czech
government totaled $394 million in 1999. The majority of the cost was
in health care treatment to both smokers and those affected by passive
smoking, but the survey also included lost working days for government
employees, lost income tax due to higher death rates and the cost of
fires caused by cigarettes.
On the other side, the report said, all
the losses were almost exactly balanced out by the excise duty charged
by the Czech government. On top of that, the government benefited from
value added tax of $89 million; customs duty of $9 million; and income
tax from tobacco businesses in the Czech Republic of $19 million.
"Our principal finding is that the
negative financial effects of smoking - such as increased health care
costs - are more than offset by positive effects - such as excise tax
and VAT collected on tobacco products,'' the report said.
Ales Janku, head of public relations at
Philip Morris, Czech Republic, said the report was produced in reaction
to a planned report by the Czech Health Ministry which seemed to indicate
that the state was losing money as result of widespread smoking.
He added that the company feared the Czech
parliament could excessively raise taxes on cigarettes as it tries to
harmonize its taxes with the European Union. Czech cigarette taxes are
currently 42 percent, compared with EU recommendations of 59 percent.
"No government can calculate with
reports like that,'' said Otakar Cerny, spokesman for the Czech health
ministry. "The health minister leads an irreconcilable struggle
with smoking so that Czech citizens live long and healthy lives.''